Skip to content
Singahi
Get an assessment

A · Assessment

Secure code and composition review.

Find the flaws that live in the code itself, before they ship. We review your source and its dependencies for the business-logic and framework-specific issues scanners miss.

Why it matters

Automated scanners flag known patterns, but the bugs that cause real damage often sit in your own logic and in the third-party code you depend on. A human review catches what tooling can't, early, when it is cheap to fix.

How we do it

Experienced reviewers read the code that matters, work through the business logic, and check your dependencies for known and risky components (SCA). We work to OWASP and language-specific best practice, and tie each finding back to where it lives in the code.

  • OWASP ASVS
  • OWASP Top 10
  • SCA

What you get

  • Manual review of high-risk code
  • Business-logic flaw analysis
  • Dependency and composition (SCA) review
  • Reproducible findings with fixes
  • Remediation guidance for your team
  • A retest of fixed issues

Frameworks & rigor

Named standards, real rigor.

We work to the standards your auditors and customers recognise, and certified practitioners do the work on every engagement.

OWASP ASVSOWASP Top 10CWE

Team credentials: OSCP · CISSP · CISA · CEH · ISO 27001 Lead Auditor.

Why Singahi

What you get with Singahi.

One team, end to end

Compliance, assessment and managed security from one partner that grows with you.

Credentials on the actual team

OSCP, CISSP, CISA, CEH and ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, on every engagement.

AI-assisted and manual

Automation for scale, with people for the judgment that actually matters.

Built to prove it

Evidence your customers, investors and regulators recognise.

FAQ

Questions, answered

How is this different from a SAST scan?

A scanner is a starting point. We add human review of your business logic and a real look at your dependencies, which is where the findings that matter usually hide.

Do you need our full codebase?

We focus on the high-risk areas like auth, payments, data handling and integrations rather than reading every line. We agree the scope with you.

Do you check third-party libraries?

Yes. Composition review (SCA) looks at the components you depend on for known vulnerabilities and risky packages.

Do you review every line of code?

No, and you would not want to pay for that. We focus on the security-sensitive paths: authentication, authorisation, data handling and the places a flaw would actually hurt.

Can you work with our language and framework?

Most likely. We review across common web, mobile and backend stacks. Tell us what you are built on and we will confirm before we start.

Derisk. Build Trust.

Prove your security. Close the deal.

Tell us what's prompting this, whether a questionnaire, an audit deadline or an investor ask. We reply within four business hours.