Skip to content
Singahi

A · Assessment

Web application penetration testing

AI-assisted and manual testing of your web apps that goes past the scanner. We surface the business-logic flaws, broken access control and chained attacks automated tools miss, and hand you findings you can act on.

Why it matters

A customer or auditor wants evidence your web application has been tested by people, not just tools. Scanners flag missing headers; they miss the broken access control, IDOR and business-logic flaws that actually get exploited. You need a report that proves real exploitability and shows how to fix it.

How we do it

We start with AI-assisted reconnaissance for coverage, then experienced testers exploit by hand for depth, working to the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and the OWASP Top 10. We cover authentication, session management, access control, input handling and business logic, confirm real exploitability, and rank findings by business impact rather than raw severity. Every finding comes with a proof of concept and a fix.

Team credentials: OSCP · CISSP · CISA · CEH · ISO 27001 Lead Auditor.

What you get

  • Executive summary for leadership, technical detail for engineers
  • Every finding with severity, a CVSS v4.0 vector and a proof of concept
  • Attack chains showing how lower-rated issues combine into real impact
  • A prioritised remediation roadmap with target dates
  • A retest to confirm the findings are closed
  • An attestation letter for your customers and auditors

See the deliverable

See a sample report.

Download a full, anonymised sample report so you can see exactly what you get before you engage. It uses fictional “Sample Client” data, but the structure, depth and rigour are the real thing.

  • An executive summary and a per-finding technical write-up
  • Every finding with a CVSS v4.0 vector and a proof of concept
  • Attack chains showing how issues combine into real impact
  • A prioritised remediation roadmap with target dates

Get the PDF

Sample web application penetration test report (PDF)

FAQ

Questions, answered

Is this automated or manual testing?
Both. We use AI-assisted reconnaissance and scanning for coverage, then experienced testers exploit by hand for depth. The findings that matter most are almost always the manual ones.
Will testing disrupt our application?
We agree scope, timing and rules of engagement first, and test non-destructively by default. Anything with a risk of impact is confirmed with you before we run it.
Do we get something we can share with customers?
Yes. Alongside the technical report you get an executive summary and an attestation letter you can share in security questionnaires and vendor reviews.
Do you retest after we fix the findings?
Yes. A retest is included, so you and your customers have confirmation the issues are actually closed, not just reported.
How do you decide severity?
Each finding carries a CVSS v4.0 vector, and we assess real-world exploitability and business impact on top of the raw score, so the priority reflects the actual risk to you.

Why Singahi

What you get with Singahi.

One team, end to end

Compliance, assessment and managed security from one partner that grows with you.

Credentials on the actual team

OSCP, CISSP, CISA, CEH and ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, on every engagement.

AI-assisted and manual

Automation for scale, with people for the judgment that actually matters.

Built to prove it

Evidence your customers, investors and regulators recognise.

Reviewed and updated

Derisk. Build Trust.

Talk to a practitioner.

Tell us what's prompting this, whether a questionnaire, an audit deadline or an investor ask. We reply within four business hours.

What happens next

  1. Tell us the trigger

    A questionnaire, an audit date or an investor ask. The short form or a call both work.

  2. A practitioner replies

    A senior practitioner, not a bot, within four business hours.

  3. You get a scoped next step

    An honest view of what the work involves. No pressure, no theatre.