A · Assessment
Web application penetration testing
AI-assisted and manual testing of your web apps that goes past the scanner. We surface the business-logic flaws, broken access control and chained attacks automated tools miss, and hand you findings you can act on.
Why it matters
A customer or auditor wants evidence your web application has been tested by people, not just tools. Scanners flag missing headers; they miss the broken access control, IDOR and business-logic flaws that actually get exploited. You need a report that proves real exploitability and shows how to fix it.
How we do it
We start with AI-assisted reconnaissance for coverage, then experienced testers exploit by hand for depth, working to the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and the OWASP Top 10. We cover authentication, session management, access control, input handling and business logic, confirm real exploitability, and rank findings by business impact rather than raw severity. Every finding comes with a proof of concept and a fix.
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG)
- OWASP Top 10
- OWASP ASVS
- PTES
- MITRE ATT&CK
- OWASP WSTG
- CWE
Team credentials: OSCP · CISSP · CISA · CEH · ISO 27001 Lead Auditor.
What you get
- Executive summary for leadership, technical detail for engineers
- Every finding with severity, a CVSS v4.0 vector and a proof of concept
- Attack chains showing how lower-rated issues combine into real impact
- A prioritised remediation roadmap with target dates
- A retest to confirm the findings are closed
- An attestation letter for your customers and auditors
See the deliverable
See a sample report.
Download a full, anonymised sample report so you can see exactly what you get before you engage. It uses fictional “Sample Client” data, but the structure, depth and rigour are the real thing.
- An executive summary and a per-finding technical write-up
- Every finding with a CVSS v4.0 vector and a proof of concept
- Attack chains showing how issues combine into real impact
- A prioritised remediation roadmap with target dates
Proof
How this looks in practice.
Tell us what's prompting it. A senior practitioner replies within four business hours.
FAQ
Questions, answered
Is this automated or manual testing?
Will testing disrupt our application?
Do we get something we can share with customers?
Do you retest after we fix the findings?
How do you decide severity?
Across the lifecycle
Related services.
- Assessment
Penetration testing
AI-assisted & manual: web, mobile, API, network, thick client
- Assessment
API penetration testing
REST, GraphQL & gRPC to the OWASP API Top 10
- Assessment
Network penetration testing
External & internal VAPT: services, patches, lateral movement
- Assessment
Mobile app penetration testing
Android & iOS to the OWASP MASVS, plus the backend
- Assessment
Cloud security testing
AWS · Azure · GCP config, workloads & hardening
- Assessment
Secure code review
Business-logic flaws & dependency (SCA) review
Why Singahi
What you get with Singahi.
One team, end to end
Compliance, assessment and managed security from one partner that grows with you.
Credentials on the actual team
OSCP, CISSP, CISA, CEH and ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, on every engagement.
AI-assisted and manual
Automation for scale, with people for the judgment that actually matters.
Built to prove it
Evidence your customers, investors and regulators recognise.
Reviewed and updated
Derisk. Build Trust.
Talk to a practitioner.
Tell us what's prompting this, whether a questionnaire, an audit deadline or an investor ask. We reply within four business hours.
What happens next
Tell us the trigger
A questionnaire, an audit date or an investor ask. The short form or a call both work.
A practitioner replies
A senior practitioner, not a bot, within four business hours.
You get a scoped next step
An honest view of what the work involves. No pressure, no theatre.